Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Emile Hudd vs Semen Pankin Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hudd vs Pankin analysis and find out who is favored!
Emile Hudd vs Semen Pankin Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hudd 1 - 0 Pankin
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hudd has won 48.89% of points on their second serve, while Pankin has won 34.78%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hudd, in recent form, has won 51.41% of their opponent's second serve points, while Pankin has won 36.11%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.03% and 31.58% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hudd has saved 62.78% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pankin has saved 57.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hudd has won 62.67% of matches played (W/L 47/ 28), with Pankin winning 59.09% (W/L 13/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hudd has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 71% (W/L 5/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 12/ 8). Pankin has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 11/ 7), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Hudd has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 45/ 27), where as Pankin has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 59.09% of matches (W/L 13/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hudd winning 1 times and Pankin being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hudd winning 2 and Pankin winning 0. The last match between Hudd and Pankin was at the M15 Winston-Salem, 08-11-2023, First, Hard with Emile Hudd getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:58:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hudd and Pankin have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hudd winning 0 times and Pankin 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hudd winning 0, and Pankin 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hudd has played against opponents with an average rank of 147.99 while Pankin has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hudd has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pankin has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hudd has converted 45.79% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pankin has converted 50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
682
Rank
682
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
63% (65-38)
Career Total W/L
57% (20-15)
62% (18-11)
YTD W/L
60% (3-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Emile Hudd vs Semen Pankin For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Hudd VS Pankin
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Emile Hudd | Semen Pankin |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:58:0 | 1:58:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (41/66) | 55% (35/64) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 56% (23/41) | 63% (22/35) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 64% (16/25) | 34% (10/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 50% (3/6) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (32/64) | 41% (27/66) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Emile Hudd
Player
Semen Pankin
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Emile Hudd | Semen Pankin |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (18/11) | 60% (3/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (41/24) | 64% (7/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (339/270) | 55% (67/55) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 59% (10/7) | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.53 | 0.05 |
| Aces Total | 158 | 3 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.05 |
| DFs Total | 55 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:13 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 116.86 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1227/1907) | 69% (52/75) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (901/1227) | 63% (33/52) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (338/680) | 35% (8/23) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (87/183) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (771/1931) | 34% (25/74) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 62% (16/10) | 60% (3/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (18/29) | 60% (3/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 29% (2/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (18/17) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (18/1) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 9% (11/1) | 0% (2/0) |
Emile Hudd Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
Player
Emile Hudd
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve %
62%
(
62 of
100)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
25 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Guido Ivan Justo
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
77%
(
50 of
65)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Aleksandr Lobanov
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Blaz Rola
Player
Emile Hudd
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
72%
(
50 of
69)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
91%
(
32 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Karol Filar
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Lun Obrul
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve %
78%
(
29 of
37)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
54
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Paul Werren
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Emile Hudd
85%
(
55 of
65)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Daniel Cox
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Cem Ilkel
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Semen Pankin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 7-6(2) 3-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Brumm
Player
Semen Pankin
51%
(
38 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
52 of
75)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Semen Pankin
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-2 10-7 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Hudd Vs Pankin Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Hudd are available here and Pankin photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
